Archive for March, 2010

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010
 
A “Carve Out” Strategy
to Help Employers Reduce DB Plan Liability

 
 
Many employers continue to have concerns about their defined benefit plan liabilities and how to fully fund their plan by the 2012 deadline enacted by the 2006 Pension Protection Act. As that deadline creeps ever closer, a practical strategy plan sponsors may want to consider a transfer — or carve out — of certain liabilities and costs associated with their plans.

That strategy is discussed in a recent Employee Benefit News article. Key highlights include:

  • A plan sponsor can transfer the liabilities and costs of a particular subset of participants – retirees, for example – to an insurance company by purchasing an annuity.
  • The insurance company, whose core business is managing risk and benefit administration, assumes responsibility for future benefit payments
  • The carve out removes unwanted pension liabilities from the plan sponsor’s balance sheet, reduces the volatility of plan earnings and funding levels, and minimizes the impact of future regulatory changes

An Ideal Solution
United of Omaha’s Pension Guard offers an excellent solution for clients who want to:

  • Terminate an existing defined benefit plan; or
  • Transfer all or a portion of their benefit payment obligations for certain subsets of participants

For more information, contact me directly:

Kerry Roach, Regional Sales Director
Cell: (970) 331-1079
Office: (888) 543-6998
Fax: (402) 351-2176
E-mail: Kerry.Roach@mutualofomaha.com

Jared Baker, Internal Wholesaler
Office: (402) 351-2792
Fax: (402) 351-2176
E-mail: Jared.Baker@mutualofomaha.com

 
 
Get Retirement Right
Corporate Headquarters
Retirement Marketing Solutions, Inc.
9140 W. Dodge Rd., Suite 380
Omaha, NE 68114
866.949.6191
rms401k.com
National Sales Office
Retirement Marketing Solutions
5475 Rings Rd., Suite 110
Dublin, OH 43017
866.761.7900
rms401k.com
Retirement Marketing Solutions, Inc. (RMS) is a national wholesaling organization that specializes in retirement products. With seasoned retirement experts located across the U.S., RMS provides sales support, proposal generation, education, enrollment support and ongoing services to independent brokers and advisors. RMS works diligently to develop relationships with select providers to secure quality products and competitive pricing arrangements on behalf of those who sell the products.

A Mutual of Omaha Company

United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and Companion Life Insurance Company are affiliate companies of Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company is licensed in all states except New York. Companion Life Insurance Company is licensed only in New York.

United of Omaha Life Insurance Company accepts full responsibility for all contractual obligations under its group annuity contracts. In New York, group annuity contracts are underwritten by Companion Life Insurance Company, Hauppauge NY. Companion Life Insurance Company accepts full responsibility for all contractual obligations under its group annuity contracts.

No financial liability will be incurred by the parent or affiliate companies for business transacted by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company or Companion Life Insurance Company. Products not available in all states.

For producer use only; not intended for the general public. If you no longer wish to receive information,
please click here to send a blank e-mail and unsubscribe from this list.

RPD892

Really Managing Care and Costs

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

March 30, 2010

By BRIAN KLEPPER

One of my favorite health care stories is about Jerry Reeves MD, who in 2004 took the helm of a 300,000 life health plan in Las Vegas, including about 110,000 union members, and drove so much waste out of that system – without reducing benefits and while improving quality – that the union gave its members a 60 cent/hour raise. There was no magic here. It was a straightforward and rigorously managed combination of proven approaches.

Dr. Reeves’ work betrayed the lie that tremendous health care costs are inevitable. To a large degree, the nation’s major health plans abetted this perception when they effectively stopped doing medical management in 1999. (Most have recently begun managing again in earnest.) The result was an explosion in cost – 4 times general inflation and 3.5 times workers earnings between 1999 and 2009 – that has priced a growing percentage of individual and corporate purchasers out of the health coverage market, dangerously destabilizing the health care marketplace and the larger US economy. In 2008, PriceWaterhouse Coopers published a scathing analysis suggesting that $1.2 trillion (55%) of the $2.2 trillion health care spend at that time was waste.

As the chief sponsors for most Americans’ health coverage, businesses have struggled to cope with health care cost while identifying value. Large American businesses, with tens or hundreds of thousands of employees, have recruited high profile benefits professionals – think of Jill Berger at Marriott, Ned Holland at Embarq, Peter Hayes at Hannaford Brothers or (the recently retired) Cecily Hall at Microsoft, each with terrific reputations – who, with their staffs, orchestrate sophisticated campaigns focused on the health of their employees and their families, and on the cost-effectiveness of their programming. Even so, few large firms provide comprehensive, quality benefits at a cost that remains consistently below national averages, and for years now America’s CEOs have routinely reported that their top business concern, health care, is their most unpredictable, large cost.

For mid-sized business, though, – here I’m referring to firms with 200-5,000 employees – the task is significantly more difficult. Health benefits managers in these companies have far fewer resources, typically work alone without the benefit of staff, and are often overwhelmed by the complexity of their tasks. Held accountable for their organizations’ health costs, they often default to whatever the brokers and health plans suggest. 

But a few excel. For them, managing the many different issues – e.g., chronic disease, patient engagement, physician self-referrals, specialist and inpatient over-utilization, pharmacy management – is a discipline. A couple years ago, I was introduced to someone like this. 

Barbara Barrett was trained as a paralegal. She is now General Manager of TLC Benefit Solutions, Inc., the benefits management arm of Valdosta, GA-based Langdale Industries, Inc., a small conglomerate of 24 firms with 1,000 employees, engaged primarily in wood products for the building construction industry, but also in car dealerships, energy and other concerns. 

Valdosta is rural, which puts health benefits programs at a disadvantage. Often there is only one hospital nearby and so little cost competition. Rural Georgians also may have lifestyles that make them prone to chronic diseases, which are expensive. And so on. You get the idea. 

Here’s the interesting part. Since 2000, when Barbara assumed responsibility for the management of Langdale’s employee health benefits, per employee costs have risen from $5,400/year per employee to $6,072/year per employee in 2009. That’s an average health plan cost growth of 1.31 percent per year.

I compared Langdale’s health plan cost growth to the average commercial coverage inflation rate for an employer with 200+ employees provided in the Kaiser Family Foundation/Health Research and Educational Trust (KFF/HRET) 2009 Employer Health Benefit Survey. The calculation showed that, in that nine years, Barbara’s management allowed Langdale to provide its 1,000 employees and their families with comprehensive medical, dental and drug benefits for $29 million less than the average of other firms that size. That’s a nine year savings of $29,000 per employee, or an average of $3,200 per employee per year lower than the national average. All without reducing benefits or transferring the cost burden to employees, and while quantitatively improving quality.

Image002  

So how did Barbara approach the problem? Here are a few of her steps:

Under her leadership, Langdale set up TLC Benefit Solutions, a HIPAA-compliant firm that administers and processes Langdale’s medical, dental and drug claims. This allowed Barbara to more directly track, manage and control claim overpayments, waste and abuse.

The claims also gave her immediate access to quality and cost data on doctors, hospitals and other vendors. She supplements these data with external information, like Medicare cost reports for hospitals in the region. This allows her to identify physicians and hospital services that provide low or high value. She then created incentives that steer patients to high value physicians and services and away from low value ones. When complex services necessary to treat certain conditions are not available or of inadequate quality or value locally, she shops the larger region, often sending patients as far away as Atlanta, three and a half hours away.

She analyzes the claims data to identify which patients have chronic disease and which patients are likely to have a major acute event over the next year. Chronic patients are directed into the company’s opt-out disease management/wellness/prevention program. Acute patients are connected with a physician for immediate intervention.

She provides Langdale’s employees and families with confidential health advocate services that explain and encourage use of the company’s wellness, prevention and disease management programs. And she uses incentive programs to reward patients who enter these programs and meet targets.

Barbara has mounted many more initiatives in group health, but her responsibilities also extend to life, flex plan, supplemental benefits, retirement plan, workers’ compensation, liability and risk insurance. The results for Langdale in these areas include lower than average absenteeism, disability costs and turnover costs.

The point is that Ms. Barrett and Langdale have been pro-active, endlessly innovative, and aggressive about managing the process. That attitude and rigor has paid off through tremendous savings, yes, but it has also produced a desirable corporate environment that demonstrates that Langdale values its employees and the community. The employees and their families are healthier as a result, and are more productive at work. This has borne unexpected fruit. The industries Langdale is in have been hit particularly hard by the recession, and the benefits savings Barbara’s efforts generate have helped save jobs.

Barbara Barrett and many others like her on the front line are virtually unknown in health care. Most often, their achievements go unnoticed beyond the executive offices.

But they manage the health and costs of populations in a way that all groups should and could be managed.

Brian Klepper is a health care analyst.

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010
 
To Our Valued Sales Partners:
Health care reform will present both challenges
and opportunities for our industry, for The IHC
Group and for our valued partners. We are in
a good position to take advantage of the opportunities, and to respond favorably to
the challenges. Here’s why:
.
We have time to react.

Although there are a few provisions that will kick
in fairly quickly, such as no pre-ex requirements
for children and elimination of lifetime and “unreasonable” annual maximums, the most significant changes do not begin until 2014.
The vast majority of our medical plans in the
small group and individual market already have extremely high annual and lifetime maximums.
.
The devil is in the details.
For example, the legislative language regarding minimum loss ratios, which is set to start in
2011, is far from clear. The implications of a minimum loss ratio standard—by company size, by product, by duration,by class of business, by claim definition—are still to be determined. The
role of limited medical plans in not clearly defined.
.
Agents will be part of the process.

Although compensation methods may look
different in 2014 and beyond, nothing in the
new law precludes the role of agents.
.
IHC Health Solutions has a strong
online presence.

We had more than 1 million online sessions
in 2009, and that was prior to the launch of
MNL online. By maximizing our online presence, we have set ourselves apart from other carriers.
By making it easier for our producers to serve
their customers, we improve our ability to adapt positively to regulatory change.
.
We are diversified—and becoming even
more diversified this year.

The IHC Group’s employer stop-loss segment
could likely be enhanced as self-funding of
health benefits will become more attractive to certain (particularly smaller) employer groups.
We expect continued growth in our dental and vision business lines. This year we plan to
launch Medicare Supplement plans. We have
been growing our dental and group life blocks of business. We have plans to be a key player in
the critical illness and accident medical arenas. And we are committed to continued success of
our small group and individual medical business lines, including short-term medical.
.

Some key things to remember.
For the next six to 12 months very little changes, so we need to keep doing what
we do best. In fact, we may have more opportunity for sales as consumers lock
in plans that will be grandfathered under
the new rules.
Almost none of the rules are fully established. There are two national
elections between now and 2014.
There are provisions of the new law
that favor smaller companies like us in
order to promote competition.
We will be regularly communicating with you as details emerge.

We have a bright future at IHC Health Solutions regardless of how the changes play out.
Health insurance reform has been happening incrementally for many years, and we have
been adapting to it. Change is inevitable, but success is optional. Let’s work together to
make the most of this opportunity.

Sincerely,
.
Jeff Smedsrud
CEO, IHC Health Solutions
Co-President, Fully Insured Division

.
.

.

.
.
.

For agent use only. Not for public distribution or solicitation.
Copyright © 2010 IHC Health Solutions

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JOIN US in becoming key players in the political process.

Join ACAN today.

Video: Our priorities for health care reform.

 

Health Care Reform – Timeline

The federal health care reform legislation, known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, signed by the President on March 23, 2010, and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act approved by Congress, signed by the President today, will expand the availability of health care coverage to millions of Americans. While some of the measures will be implemented this year, many do not take effect until 2014 and some extend out to 2020.

Below is a high-level overview of the timeline.  It is important to note that many of these reforms and their effective dates are subject to the rules and regulations process both at the state and federal levels – which could alter the intended timing of implementation.

2010

New Programs:
* Temporary retiree reinsurance program is established
* National risk pool is created, small business tax credit is established
* $250 rebate for Medicare members who reach the ”doughnut hole”

Insurance Reforms:
* Prohibits lifetime benefit limits – based on dollar amounts
* Allows restricted annual limits on the dollar value of certain benefits
* Coverage rescissions/cancellations are prohibited (except for fraud or intentional misrepresentation)
* Cost-sharing obligations for preventive services are prohibited
* Dependent coverage up to age 26 is mandated
* Internal and external appeal processes must be established
* Pre-existing condition exclusions for dependent children (under 19 years of age) are prohibited
* New health plan disclosure and transparency requirements are created

2011

Insurance Reforms:
* Uniform coverage documents and standard definitions are developed
* Minimum medical loss ratios are mandated

Medicare Reforms:
* Medicare Advantage cost sharing limits effective
* Medicare beneficiaries who reach the doughnut hole will receive a 50% discount on brand name drugs
* A 10% Medicare bonus will be provided to primary care physicians and general surgeons practicing in underserved areas, such as inner cities and rural communities.
* Medicare Advantage plans would begin to have their payments frozen.

Other:
* Employers are required to report the value of health care benefits on employees’ W2 tax statements.
* Annual industry fee for pharmaceutical manufacturers of brand name drugs.
* Voluntary long term care insurance program would be made available to provide cash benefit for assisting disabled individuals to stay in their homes or cover nursing home costs. Benefits would start five years after people begin paying a fee for coverage.
* Funding for community health centers would be increased to provide care for many low income and uninsured people.

2012

* Hospitals, physicians, and payers would be encouraged to band together in “accountable care organizations.”
* Hospitals with high rates of preventable readmissions would face reduced Medicare payments.

2013

* Individuals making $200,000 a year or couples making $250,000 would have a higher Medicare payroll tax of 2.35% on earned income —up from the current 1.45%. A new tax of 3.8% on unearned income, such as dividends and interest, is also added.
* Medical expense contributions to flexible spending accounts (FSAs) limited to $2,500 a year—indexed for inflation. In addition, the thresholds for claiming itemized tax deduction for medical expenses rise from 7.5% to 10% of income.
* Medical device manufacturers would have a 2.9% sales tax on medical devices; devices such as eyeglasses, contact lenses, and hearing aids would be exempt.
* Eliminates deduction for expenses allocable to Medicare Part D subsidy for employers who maintain prescription drug plans for their Medicare Part D eligible retirees.

2014

Coverage Mandates & Subsidies:
* Individual and employer coverage responsibilities are effective. 
* Individual affordability tax credits are created and small business tax credits are expanded.

Health Insurance Exchange & Insurance Reforms:
* State individual and small group health insurance exchanges operational.
* Guaranteed issue, guaranteed renewability, modified community rating and minimum benefit standards (“essential benefits” plan) effective. 
* Lifetime and annual dollar limits are prohibited for essential benefits.
* Pre-existing condition exclusions are prohibited.

Taxes & Fees:
* Addition of new taxes on health insurers

Medicaid and Medicare Reform:
* Medicaid expanded to cover low income individuals under age 65 up to 133% of the federal poverty level—about $28,300 for a family of four.
* Minimum medical loss ratio of 85% required for Medicare Advantage plans

2018

Taxes & Fees:
* Tax (“Cadillac tax”) imposed on employer sponsored health insurance plans that offer policies with generous levels of coverage.

2020

Medicare Reform:
* Doughnut hole coverage gap in Medicare prescription benefit is fully phased out. Seniors continue to pay the standard 25% of their drug costs until they reach the threshold for Medicare catastrophic coverage.
See Aetna’s work to transform Health Care in America. 

Aetna is the brand name used for products and services provided by one or more of the Aetna group of subsidiary companies. Those companies include Aetna Health Inc. and Aetna Health Insurance Company, 151 Farmington Avenue, Hartford, CT 06156


© 2010 Aetna Inc.

If you prefer not to receive these emails in the future, please unsubscribe.

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010
       

   MARCH 2010      
      ISSUE 1   
    HEALTH CARE REFORM BECOMES LAW

On Tuesday, March 23, President Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act into law, bringing wide-spread reform to the U.S. health system and some significant changes to the health insurance industry.

With the passing of this law comes many questions and uncertainties regarding the reform components and the implementation timeline. As a valued broker, Guardian is committed to ensuring that you and your clients are kept up-to-date with reform developments and aware of any potential impact that reform may bring.

The health reform law is certainly a complex and large piece of legislation to fully digest and understand. Furthermore, not all of the details of the reform provisions have been clearly defined yet by the federal government. Additional legislative activity, as well as extensive rulemaking will most likely occur over the next 12 months and beyond, providing some additional guidance to both carriers and brokers. Click here to learn more >

WANT TO KNOW MORE ABOUT REFORM?

America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) has developed two great reform resources that we encourage you to review: The Reform Law Summary and Reform Implementation Timeline. Please visit the AHIP website for the most up-to-date information on reform at www.ahip.org or the National Association of Health Underwriters (NAHU) .

   
 
Three Reform Provisions That Your Clients Are Interested In Now
1 Dependent Coverage Extended To Age 26 On Medical Plans
2 No Lifetime Limits On Medical Plans
3 No Pre-existing Conditions On Medical Plans
 
  Read Guardian’s Disclosures, Privacy Policies, SEC Rule 11Ac1-6 Quarterly Report.
Copyright© 2010, The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America. All rights reserved.
For Broker Use Only. Not for the General Public.
2010-2884
 

This message sent to riskmanager@sbcglobal.net by guardiannews@glic.com.
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
7 Hanover Square – New York, NY 10004
Unsubscribe | Update Profile/Email Address | Forward to a Colleague

MultiPlan Completes All Stock Acquistion of Viant

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

MyHealthGuide Source: MultiPlan, 3/15/2010, www.multiplan.com and www.Viant.com

New York, NY – MultiPlan, Inc. announced that it has acquired Viant, Inc., bringing together the considerable expertise and complementary solutions of both companies to produce what MultiPlan believes will be the industry’s most comprehensive provider of healthcare cost management services.

“The timing couldn’t be better for Viant to join the MultiPlan family, as containment of healthcare costs has become the nation’s imperative,” said Mark Tabak, MultiPlan’s Chief Executive Officer. “Together, we plan to more effectively leverage our companies’ combined expertise and technology to improve efficiencies and patient flow for providers, driving significant savings for healthcare consumers and payers.”

Founded in 1980, MultiPlan is a provider of PPO network and related transaction-based solutions that reduce the per-unit costs of healthcare claims. MultiPlan contracts directly with over 5,000 hospitals, 115,000 ancillary care facilities and 625,000 practitioners who participate in the company’s national primary and complementary PPO networks.

Established in 1990 as Preferred Payment Systems, Inc., Viant today offers PPO networks, network management, pre-payment and post-payment services to commercial and government clients. Viant’s networks represent approximately 5,400 hospitals, 95,000 ancillary facilities and 600,000 practitioners.

Added Tabak, “With our combined product lines, MultiPlan has a solid foundation from which to develop new solutions as healthcare reforms take shape. We look forward to working with our new colleagues at Viant to meet the needs of this changing marketplace.”

Together, MultiPlan and Viant offer healthcare payers an end-to-end solution for managing healthcare unit costs on a pre- and post-payment basis.

About MultiPlan

MultiPlan, Inc. is the industry’s most comprehensive provider of healthcare cost management solutions. The company provides over 2,300 clients with a single gateway to a host of primary, complementary and out-of-network strategies for managing the financial risks associated with healthcare claims. Clients include large and mid-sized insurers, third party administrators, self-funded plans, HMOs and other entities that pay claims on behalf of health plans. Incorporated in 1980, MultiPlan is owned by a group of investors led by the Carlyle Group. Visit www.multiplan.com.

About Viant

Viant, Inc. (through its subsidiaries including Texas True Choice and national PPO network, Beech Street) provides healthcare payment solutions through primary and complementary networks, integrated network and contract management, non-network cost management services and post payment audit and recovery services to the U.S. commercial and public health insurance sectors. Viant’s comprehensive and effective cost management strategies focus on timely, accurate and fair payment for providers, payers and patients.  Visit www.Viant.com.

Another Point of View

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

There are enough problems with reform – big, obvious, scary problems – that make lying about reform unnecessary. Yet opponents continue to resort to ludicrous, unsupportable, and completely false claims about the bill, with some of the leading detractors choosing to rewrite history in an effort to scare voters and score political points.

It is NOT socialized medicine, socialized healthcare, government-controlled health care, a violation of the US Constitution, or any of the other ridiculous charges leveled by people who should be more responsible. The reform law is:

- pretty centrist – no public option, utilizing private, for-profit insurers to deliver insurance

- without price controls on providers or insurers, and with no utilization controls to speak of

- based on a very weak mandate that is more accurately described as a fine for those who decide to forgo coverage

Among the demagogues who know better is Newt Gingrich the former House Speaker is outraged, outraged I say, at the Democrats’ passage of the insurance mandate. He’s obviously had a change of heart, as a few short years ago he not only called for an enforceable mandate in a speech, he did it in two of the books he wrote.

Newt’s flip-floppery came about just yesterday, when the following dialogue took place on that fair and balanced network:

HANNITY: Do you think any of these constitutional challenges that are out there about the employer mandate, individual mandate, or any of the other challenges — do you think as they work their way through the courts, that any of that will be effective?

[...]

GINGRICH: Then you have to appeal the president’s ruling and they’d probably lose that fight. But what my sense is — first of all, I’m glad to see that some 13 attorneys general around the country –

HANNITY: Are going to sue.

GINGRICH: Have sued. Based on a 1992 Supreme Court decision which said that the federal government cannot punish you for failure to do something, I think that there’s an outside chance the suit will hold up. And that that will stop the individual mandate at the federal level.

Hmmm, seems pretty unequivocal.

here’s what Newt said just two years ago: “According to a June 11, 2008 Associated Press article (accessed from the Nexis database), which ran under the headline, “Gingrich suggests insurance mandate for those who can afford,” Gingrich reportedly “outlined his strategy to combat rising health care costs a plan of attack that includes insurance mandates for people who earn more than $75,000 a year” at a visit to a Nebraska health system. The article went on to report that “Gingrich called it ‘fundamentally immoral’ for a person who can afford insurance to save money by going without, then show up at an emergency room and demand free care. He said those who can afford insurance and choose not to buy it should be required to post bonds to pay for care they may someday need… Gingrich said everyone should have insurance, but not provided by the federal government.” [emphasis added]

(from MediaMatters)

Is he so ignorant, or so ballsy, that he doesn’t think anyone will pay attention to what he said, or wrote, a few short months ago? Or is Gingrich so driven, so insanely desperate for power, that he’ll be blown by political winds like a feather in a gale? Gingrich’s patently false statements are prima facie evidence of the depths to which right-wing opponents will descend in pursuit of power and popularity.

It’s disgusting and abhorrent behavior, and ill serves the nation.

What does this mean for you?

The new law of the land is nowhere close to perfect, or even very good; as I’ve said repeatedly I’m deeply concerned about the law’s all-but-complete failure to address costs. There’s so much misinformation circulating about health reform it is impossible to keep track of it all, much less debunk it.

When you hear Romney, or Boehner, or McConnell, or their fellow wingnuts proclaim the end of America as we know it, ignore them, or better, marvel at the lengths they will go in pursuit of the votes of the ignorant.

Editor’s Note: This was written by Joe Paduda, nationally known expert on our health care delivery system.

Health Care Without Borders

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

In Mexico, they have a socialized healthcare system, it is known as IMSS. At IMSS people wait in a large, open room to get screened before seeing a doctor. But in many cases, after a long wait, they may not get the treatment that is needed. This is because IMSS is running out of money. People who have serious illnesses might get superficial treatments, while a person with a simple illness, like a sprained ankle, can get as much as a 7 day incapacity.

An incapacity is the official declaration from IMSS that you have been treated and are excused from work until the end of your incapacity. In one case of a sprained ankle, the incapacity was for 7 days. For seven days, a 20 year old man was not allowed to work, and only recieved 60% of his salary during the incapcity. The reason he was given the incapacity, and a seriously ill person was not, is simple. It costs IMSS nearly nothing to treat the man with the sprained ankle.

All corporations in Mexico pay taxes to IMSS, they are approximately 10% of payroll. But, because the care given by IMSS is so poor, most large corporations pay for a private major medical insurance for their employees in addition.

Amost all middle class citizens have their babies in private hospitals with private doctors, and go to private doctors when they are ill. If you are pregnant, and middle class, you will still need to go to IMSS which is required by law to grant a 90 day leave of absence from work. The leave is taken 45 days before the birth, and 45 days after. Even if you are able or willing to work, you cannot.

Medications are not supplied by IMSS, although they are prescribed. Blook is not provided, and must be purchased from the local blood bank.

It is not uncommon for employees to collect money from co-workers to help fund medical expenses, especially for lower income workers.

Furthermore, a person must be employeed to receive benefits from IMSS. A special program is available for unemployed people, but at a lower benefit level.

Many times ill employees need to miss work to go to IMSS for treatment, but they are turned away without an incapacity, even for the day they spent attempting to get treatment. In addition there is a transportation expense for the employee, as well as lost income for missing work. They may also have the absence counted as an unjustified absence on their attendance record. If the illness does not go away and the absenses mount, the employee may face disciplinary action by the employer. These types of problems have forced employers to reqrite their attendance policies to be more lenient in order to avoid having to discipline, or worse, terminate, an otherwise good employees.

While is it not completely clear what Congress in the US is proposing, there do appear to be many elements that are similar to IMSS. Is this what we want in the US healthcare system?

Editor’s Note: This article appeared in March 2010 issue of Freedom Today!. Their website is http://brownsville.rgvtp.com

CIGNA Publishes Health Care Reform Bill Market Provisions Timeline

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

This is one of the best we have seen in the past several days – HCR Timeline

Monday, March 29th, 2010
Health Care Reform: Keeping You Informed
Mon, March 29, 2010 2:23:19 PM

From:
CIGNA <ProducerCommunications@CIGNA.COM>

Add to Contacts

To: “riskmanager@sbcglobal.net” <riskmanager@sbcglobal.net>  

 

Home
| Provider Directory | About Us | News | Careers | Contacts | Log In
 
March 29, 2010
Health Care Reform: Keeping You Informed

Join us for a
live interactive
web meeting
Hosted by CIGNA’s
G. William Hoagland,
Vice President of Public Policy
& Government Affairs


Client Web Meeting
Wednesday, April 7,
2:00 pm ET
(1 pm CT, Noon MT, 11 am PT)


Broker and Consultant
Web Meeting

Wednesday, April 7,
3:30 pm ET
(2:30 pm CT, 1:30 MT, 12:30 PT)
 

The long, drawn out legislative debate on health care reform is coming to a conclusion. But, of course, in many ways the real debate and very difficult process of implementing the legislation has only just begun.

CIGNA values our shared business relationship. That relationship is inextricably linked with this new law, its interpretation and most importantly its implementation. We are all in this together.

Given the complexity and magnitude of the health care reform legislation, our approach toward it has been cautious and watchful for a number of reasons. First, the Act signed into law by the President on March 23 was amended by further legislation (The Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act) that was approved by Congress on Thursday, March 25. The task of interpreting the law, to the extent sufficient details are included in the bill, can now begin.

Second, you are also likely aware of legal challenges being mounted by some states concerning key aspects of the legislation. These actions will not only make the implementation schedule even more problematic with a law as complex as this but may also have unintended and unforeseen consequences.

Third, once we have a final bill, we will all discover that it delegates to the Secretary of HHS, Treasury, and Labor extensive authorities for interpreting many provisions impacting our business relationship. Some of these regulations will come quickly such as setting the medical loss ratio requirements or defining dependent eligibility on a parent’s insurance plan, while others such as the employer and individual mandates and minimum benefits will be longer in development.

Nonetheless, it is our responsibility as business partners to provide you with our best thinking on what this legislation will mean for you and when we can expect implementation. It is our further responsibility to reflect our and your concerns as regulations are drafted, proposed and finalized. Finally, with our collective real world experience, I am hopeful that we can revisit certain provisions in the law for refinement or amendment in the coming Congress.

In the immediate timeframe, where we are confident of the legal interpretation and how we will implement those provisions, we will continue to keep you informed through your CIGNA representatives. We are resolute in our desire to make your and our transition to this new health care landscape as efficient, effective, and painless as possible. I commit CIGNA, my management and my business team members to help you as we address the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.

Click here to view a high-level timeline for the key provisions of the Act. As has been our practice, we will host web meetings regarding the provisions of the Act. The next web meetings will occur on April 7. We will offer a session for clients at 2:00 pm ET and a separate session for brokers and consultants at 3:30 pm ET that you are welcome to join.

We look forward to our discussions on health care reform on April 7.


David M. Cordani
President and Chief Executive Officer

Feedback
We welcome your feedback. Let us know what types of articles you would like to see in this e-mail.

Thank you.

This message has been sent to you to provide information that may be helpful to your business, and to provide an opportunity to give us your requests and general feedback. This alert is not intended for distribution to potential or active customers or enrollees. If you do not wish to receive future emails like this one, please click here.

“CIGNA” and the “Tree of Life” logo are registered service marks of CIGNA Intellectual Property, Inc., licensed for use by CIGNA Corporation and its operating subsidiaries. All products and services are provided exclusively by such operating subsidiaries and not by CIGNA Corporation. Such operating subsidiaries include Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (CGLIC), Tel-Drug, Inc. and its affiliates, CIGNA Behavioral Health, Inc., Intracorp, and HMO or service company subsidiaries of CIGNA Health Corporation and CIGNA Dental Health, Inc. In California, HMO plans are offered by CIGNA HealthCare of California, Inc. and Great-West Healthcare of California, Inc. All other medical plans in California are insured or administered by CGLIC. CGLIC has acquired the business of Great-West Healthcare.

03/10 © 2010 CIGNA