Federal government examining whether insurance giant is illegally raising Medicare program users’ monthly payments.
Betsy Reed – Editor, Guardian US
US justice department opens civil fraud investigation into UnitedHealthcare
The US Department of Justice is reportedly investigating the insurance giant UnitedHealthcare for its Medicare billing practices.
The federal government is examining whether UnitedHealthcare is using patient diagnoses to illegally increase the lump sum monthly payments received through the Medicare Advantage program, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal.
Although it is best known for its insurance operations, UnitedHealthcare is one of the largest corporations in the world with a $457bn market capitalization. Its businesses touch health technology, pharmacy benefits and physician practices.
The company is so large that one industry analyst estimated 5% of US gross domestic product flowed through its infrastructure each day. It is the largest employer of doctors in the US with more than 90,000 physicians in 2023, or nearly one in 10 American doctors.
According to the report, the justice department is now conducting a civil fraud investigation.
Medicare is a public health insurance program for the elderly and disabled that covers more than 65 million Americans. About half of those beneficiaries use Medicare Advantage plans – a program started by Congress to allow private insurers to manage beneficiaries’ care.
At the time it was created, during the George W Bush administration, supporters argued private corporations would be able to more efficiently provide the same services as government and save taxpayers money.
However, a raft of studies now show the program probably costs taxpayers billions more each year. A study by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (Medpac) found that in 2024 alone, Medicare Advantage plans probably cost taxpayers $83bn (22%) more than traditional Medicare.
Further, an increasing number of patients have complained about how the program makes it difficult to access care, for example by requiring patients to seek permission, or “prior authorization”, from insurers before treatment.
The investigation into UnitedHealthcare is being carried out by the Department of Justice’s civil fraud division and the Department of Health and Human Services office of the inspector general, the journal reported. The investigation is separate from an ongoing Department of Justice antitrust inquiry.
In a statement responding to the journal’s report, UnitedHealthgroup said: “The Wall Street Journal continues to report misinformation on the Medicare Advantage (MA) program. The government regularly reviews all [Medicare Advantage] plans to ensure compliance and we consistently perform at the industry’s highest levels on those reviews.”
Bottom of Form
Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The statement continued: “We are not aware of the ‘launch’ of any ‘new’ activity as reported by the Journal. We are aware, however, that the Journal has engaged in a year-long campaign to defend a legacy system that rewards volume over keeping patients healthy and addressing their underlying conditions. Any suggestion that our practices are fraudulent is outrageous and false.”
The enormous company has come under scrutiny for other parts of its business as well. UnitedHealth Group owns Change Healthcare, a technology company that facilitates as much as one-third of all payments from insurers to providers. A huge data breach in 2024 allowed hackers to “exfiltrate” as many as 85m patient records – the event was described by one analyst as healthcare’s “Deepwater Horizon moment”.
More scrutiny of the company was brought by the murder of UnitedHealthcare’s CEO, Brian Thompson. The killing of the executive described as a kind family man was met with apathy and derision from the American public, who described routinely being denied healthcare.
UnitedHealth’s stock declined 10% in early morning trading on the news.
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask whether you could support the Guardian’s journalism as we cover the onslaught of news from the second Trump administration.
As Trump himself observed: “The first term, everybody was fighting me. In this term, everybody wants to be my friend.”
He’s not entirely wrong. All around us, media organizations have begun to capitulate. First, two news outlets pulled election endorsements at the behest of their billionaire owners. Next, prominent reporters bent the knee at Mar-a-Lago. And then a major network – ABC News – rolled over in response to Trump’s legal challenges and agreed to a $16m million settlement in his favor.
The Guardian is clear: we have no interest in being Donald Trump’s – or any politician’s – friend. Our allegiance as independent journalists is not to those in power but to the public. Whatever happens in the coming months and years, you can rely on the Guardian never to bow down to power, nor back down from truth.
How are we able to stand firm in the face of intimidation and threats? As journalists say: follow the money. The Guardian has neither a self-interested billionaire owner nor profit-seeking corporate henchmen pressuring us to appease the rich and powerful. We are funded by our readers and owned by the Scott Trust – whose only financial obligation is to preserve our journalistic mission in perpetuity.
What’s more, we make our fearless, fiercely independent journalism free to all, with no paywall – so that everyone in the US can have access to responsible, fact-based news.
With the new administration boasting about its desire to punish journalists, and Trump and his allies already pursuing lawsuits against newspapers whose stories they don’t like, it has never been more urgent, or more perilous, to pursue fair, accurate reporting. Can you support the Guardian today?
We value whatever you can spare, but a recurring contribution makes the most impact, enabling greater investment in our most crucial, fearless journalism. As our thanks to you, we can offer you some great benefits – including seeing far fewer fundraising messages like this. We’ve made it very quick to set up, so we hope you’ll consider it. Thank you.
Betsy Reed – Editor, Guardian US
SOURCE: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/21/united-healthcare-justice-department-investigation
