Employers Eye Innovations to Cheaper, Better Healthcare

Risk & Insurance, December 2008

“Two innovations offer solutions outside of cost-shifting and dropping coverage for self-funding companies that still would like to provide cheaper but top-notch benefits to their employees.”

“One option is to get healthcare providers to charge what medical services actually cost.”

“Self-insured companies could also apply leverage to healthcare providers by sending workers someplace else for care. That’s a large part of the premise behind another innovation – a medical travel program.”

Editor’s Note: This is an excellent article. We have initiated these suggestions in some of our more progressive groups over a year ago. This is out-of-the-box kind of solutions that work. See entire article here – cheaper-insurance

A Common Sense Understanding of Our Health Care System

This is an excellent piece written by Jeff Seiler in response to an article published by an “expert” in the health care industryhealth-care-reform
Dear Ms. Harrop,
 
I read with interest you editorial on unfurling a national health plan. I have no doubt that health care costs are a major concern for every corporation, or for that matter the government as well as many individuals. I also think you do recognize that everyone having health insurance will not lower the cost of health care. In the medical insurance business, we have a saying….”claims are claims.” No matter what, somebody is going to be paying for the claims.
 
However, the assertion that putting primary care physicians (PCPs) on a capitated system that would pay them $250,000 (or whatever dollar amount) has already been proven to be a faulty assumption for lowering costs. HMO coverage was by and large based on that system and from being in the business and from personal experience, I can tell you that it doesn’t work. Primary care may lower some costs, but PCPs being paid on capitation does not save a dime. In fact, PCPs basically turned into triage physicians. They saw as many patients as they could for their capitation payments and quickly referred those with any complaint on to a specialty physician or gave them a prescription to get them out of the office. More or less, “Get out of my office so I can make more money on non-capitated patients.” To say that they would do more on a straight capitated system is pure folly. They would have no incentive to make more money. In fact, like most people with no incentive, they would do very little. If you are going to get $250 K for seeing patients regardless, where is the incentive to do anything more than the minimum?
 
In the medical care business, 20% of the people cause 80% of the claims. It has been true for 30 years  or more and will continue to be true. Those 20% don’t have minor ailments where they need to see a PCP. They have major ailments requiring lots of specialty treatment. The big dollars that are being spent are really being spent on technology that keeps people alive that would have been dead 20 or 30 years ago.
 
I’m not saying I have a solution to the cost of health care, but cutting down on the number of uninsured will not lower the cost (their claims will still be there), and neither will a PCP based capitation system. I  am just hoping  (against all hope) that whoever they put in charge of any changes to be made will consult with someone who is actually in the front lines of the business and who understands how the money flows and the system works, because Hillary and her gang did not. McCain obviously didn’t know and it’s pretty clear that Obama knows very little as well.
 
By the way, in general, insurance company executives and hospital executives and doctors also know very little about how the costs are generated and who gets paid, so don’t count on much realistic help from them in formulating a plan. The executives are far above the fray and managing other things and doctors are notoriously poor at understanding how the system works. It’s a far more complicated subject than most people who are not in the front lines of the business can comprehend and if it’s one thing I am personally tired of, it’s having a government that can’t run itself well, telling other people how things should work.
 
Thanks for your article though.
 
Best regards,
 
Jeff Seiler
S&S Benefits Consulting, Inc.

219 Darien Ln.
Dundee, IL 60118

 

 

 

 

P:847-428-5353
F:847-428-9876
C:847-682-2870
 

Can Risk Management be Quantified?

Employer: How do we know we are doing much better this year than last year?

Risk Manager:  What is this year is last year plus or minus this year’s change.

CFO:  But change is the only constant, so why do we need to measure it?

To quantify risk management performance, the cost of risk must be measured. The components of Cost of Risk (COR) include 1. insurance premiums, 2. retained losses, 3. risk management department budgets, 4. risk management contract services. Results are compiled to show an average COR cost per $1,000 of revenues.

What is An Actuary?

“An actuary is a person who passes as an expert on the basis of a prolific ability to produce an infinite variety of encomprehensible figures calculated with micrometric precision from the vaguest of assumptions based on debatable evidence drawn from inclnclusive data derived by persons of questionalble reliability for the sole purose of confusing an already hopelessly befuddled group of persons who never read the statistics anyway.”              

Daren Daley, Perr & Knight

Community Hospitals See Record Profits in 2007

U.S. community hospitals enjoyed record profits in 2007, posting $43 billion more in revenue than expenses and creating the largest single-year jump in profit margins in at least 15 years, according to figures released by the American Hospital Association in its AHA Hospital Statistics 2009 Edition.

Sell Your Life Insurance Policy for Cash

Recently we brokered the sale of an existing $500,000 term life policy for a client. The owner of the company was in the process of selling his business to a concern in Mexico, and no longer had a need for the coverage. There was no cash value (it was a term life policy). We solicited bids for the policy. An institutional investor (a New York Bank) submitted the highest cash offer. The transaction was completed and our client received a check for $50,000.    

Viatical and Life Settlement Brokerage is regulated by the Texas Department of Insurance.

How Many Insurance Agents Do You Have Mr. Employer?

At www.freeerisa.com you can find a wealth of information through filed 5500 forms. For example, we checked on a San Antonio group of 450 employees and found that during a one year period they paid 28 agents a commission on voluntary products through one insurance company. This is an example of how some insurance companies distribute their product through various marketing levels. For example, there may be a State Manager, Regional Manager, District Manager, Area Manager, Sr. Sales Leader, Agent and Broker all paid in accordance to a commission hierarchy system. The money flows from the top down. In this case, this well known voluntary benefits carrier paid 28 agents a total of $47,883. The higest paid agent received $26,280 and the lowest paid agent received $2.

Hospital Billed Charges Versus Cost

We have several clients who have decided to take control of their health care spending by reimbursing hospitals on a cost-plus basis rather than rely on PPO discounts off billed charges.

Here are a few recent examples:

                                Billed Charges                             Plan Payment

1.                             $59,248.72                                       $11,034.84

2.                             $ 7,682.20                                        $     865.02

3.                             $25,245.63                                       $  6,864.73

4.                           $443,076.26                                      $116,086.39

Under ERISA a Plan Fiduciary must pay only what is fair and reasonable. Fiduciary liability is transfered to a third party who handles claim appeals and provides defense in Federal Court. An insurance policy indemifies the employer.    

Is Your Physician on Retainer?

A small but growing niche in health care delivery is becoming popular with both physicians and their patients.  Physicians charge patients an annual fee of $1,500 and reduce their patient load down to about 600, which is significantly less than normal. No insurance company to mess with, no claims to file, less overhead. So, for about $900,000 per year, the physician can pay his staff, spend more time with his patients and make a good profit.  These physicians provide same day appointments, house calls, extensive physicals and diagnostic testing and more consultation about topics such as diet and exercise.

Hospital Price Gouging Revealed

In our continuing struggle to bring transparency to medical care pricing, we have yet another hospital claim that was incurred in August that reveals the level of price gouging we find in almost all hospital claims. Total billed charges were approximately $109,000. The hospital graciously offered to discount this by 7%, and would settle for $101,000 if we agreed to pay quickly. We repriced this claim under Medicare 2008 RVRBS and found that Medicare would have paid about $18,000 on this claim.  The billed charges are 575% of Medicare. 

We hope our client is not going to “play ball” with this hospital, as the bill is not fair and reasonable in our opinion.

As reported to CMS, this hospital’s cost for this admission was $27,862. Therefore, the hospital will make a profit of about $73,000 for this 2 week hospital admission.   

Since the employer is a political subdivision, and ultimately the taxpayers will foot this bill, we believe that if the hospital does not come to a reasonable and fair price, the taxpayers should be informed.

Texas Department of Insurance – BCBSTX Fined $250,000

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, A Division of Health Care Service Corporation of Chicago, IL
Order Number: 080514
Date of Order:  6/13/2008
Order Final In:   June
Action Taken:  $250,000 fine with additional fine of $3,900,000 subject to possible dollar-for-dollar reduction to zero by restitution paid
Violation:  Failed to make non-preferred benefits reasonably available to its insureds; Failed to maintain an accurate listing of its preferred providers

Editor’s Note: PPO networks change almost daily. So how does one maintain an accurate listing of its preferred providers?