Archive for October 23rd, 2013

$6,350

Wednesday, October 23rd, 2013

south

By William Rusteberg

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is damn complicated. No one I know seems to have all the answers. Anyone who says they understand ACA is probably delusional or related to Dennis (http://blog.riskmanagers.us/?p=12682). At least that is my perspective after talking to many of my peers in the insurance industry during the SIIA annual convention in Chicago the past several days.

I did meet one person though, with a deep southern accent (probably from Mississippi) who kindly spelled out the essence of ACA in a way that most would understand:

“Bill, look at it this way…………..Under ACA all health plans must have no more than a $6,350 maximum out-of-pocket for each insured, or double that for a family. So just think about that for a moment…………once an individual reaches that limit, easily done with the high costs brokered by managed care companies, there is absolutely  no incentive to limit costs by either the patient or the provider…………in fact just the opposite is true……………….the quicker medical expenses add up the quicker “insurance” starts paying 100% of all expenses with no maximum limitations.”

My new best friend continued “So, how are insurance companies going to compete?…………All are mandated to limit out-of-pocket expenses to $6,350, so the competition will be formed around how to get there. Which proposal takes the longest to reach the maximum out-of-pocket, or the shortest, to reach the magic number? And, what about the cost of the insurance? Who will have the cheapest costs? Or, which proposal has the lowest out-of-pocket exposure!

Consumers will key in on out-of-pocket exposure and price, that is all.

Since all health plans will essentially be the same (insurance kicks in 100% after $6,350), upon what basis can carriers compete? The answer is pretty simple – lower reimbursements to a limited number of providers willing to work for less or unilateral forced strategies employed utilizing Cost Plus / Reference Based Pricing methodologies. The key to competition has now pivoted to relationships with willing providers or forced relationships with unwilling ones.

The market for self-funding opportunities has never been better. Employers, unlike clueless plan participants, look beyond the participant’s maximum out-of-pocket exposure. The plan sponsor’s out-of-pocket exposure is unlimited. Who do you think has the most incentive to control costs?

Smart providers will seize opportunities to selectively pick their customers. In return for quick and easy access, they will charge a premium. Do you mind paying more at Circle K for a gallon of milk, or do you park at HEB, walk 500 yards to get the same gallon of milk at a cheaper price?

We are entering some interesting times.

 

 

 

Ternian Insurance Group – Replacing Limited Benefit Plans In 2014

Wednesday, October 23rd, 2013

ternian

Now that the open enrollment season is underway for many clients, it’s a great time to examine their options for recruiting and retaining hourly employees. However, if your clients had an expense-based limited-benefit plan in place this year, it is likely expiring on or before January 1. Fortunately, there is an alternative and you still have time to implement this innovative solution.

(more…)

Feds Ask Blue Cross Not To Release Exchange Numbers

Wednesday, October 23rd, 2013

secret1

FARGO – The Obama administration asked North Dakota’s largest health insurer not to publicize how many people have signed up for health insurance through a new online exchange, a company official says.

(more…)

Help Please – Bidding Salary Equity Assessment Services

Wednesday, October 23rd, 2013

Good morning friends of Timeline. I am hoping some of you have some experience  bidding Salary Equity Assessment services, or know someone else who has. I need a statement of work, solicitation, and vendor names. Hope all is well with you.

Thanks again, appreciate any assistance.

 Anne  – anne.wheeler@txdot.gov

Drive Safe and have a lovely day.

Anne Wheeler, C.P.M., CPPB, CTPM, Services  Purchasing Section, Purchaser IV – Central, Procurement Division

512/416-4772